{"id":12680,"date":"2010-09-29T01:51:36","date_gmt":"2010-09-28T23:51:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.whalecottage.com\/blog\/?p=12680"},"modified":"2010-09-30T10:28:33","modified_gmt":"2010-09-30T08:28:33","slug":"sa-blog-awards-2010-organisers-response-to-criticism-poor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chrisvonulmenstein.com\/blog\/cape-town\/sa-blog-awards-2010-organisers-response-to-criticism-poor\/","title":{"rendered":"SA Blog Awards 2010 organisers’ response to criticism poor!"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Despite posting an invitation via Twitter to the SA Blog Awards organising committee of JP Naude, Dave Duarte and Chris Rawlinson to respond to our criticism of the SA Blog Awards 2010<\/strong><\/a>, we received nothing more than a not-so-understandable Direct Message on Twitter from Chris Rawlinson: “I think if you had taken a few mins to call me you may have most of what you said is simply not true. Hope all well. Chris”<\/em><\/p>\n

In addition, the organising committee posted\u00a0a response, two days after our blog post appeared,\u00a0to the criticism documented not only on our blog, but also written by many other bloggers (see via a Google search), on their website www.sablogawards.com<\/a>, in the News section, and not on their Home Page, where it should have been featured.\u00a0 Massive criticism of the Awards organisation also swamped Twitter on Sunday!\u00a0 One would have thought that the organisers would have sent the response to the criticism to each of the nominees by e-mail, to win their favour for the 2011 Awards!<\/p>\n

The following issues raised have not been addressed in the reply of the Organising Committee:<\/p>\n

1.\u00a0\u00a0 The change in rules\u00a0in the Awards competition over the two month period<\/p>\n

2.\u00a0\u00a0 The exclusion from the Awards dinner for the Top 10 finalists, originally indicated to be open to all<\/p>\n

3.\u00a0\u00a0 Voting at nomination stage<\/p>\n

4.\u00a0\u00a0 Organisers’ names not revealed<\/p>\n

5.\u00a0\u00a0 Judges names not revealed, and questionable capabilities of some judges, in not being bloggers<\/p>\n

6.\u00a0\u00a0 Poor standard of organisation generally<\/p>\n

7.\u00a0\u00a0 No communication about the rules to those that entered<\/p>\n

8.\u00a0\u00a0 Massive changes between the 2009 and 2010 competition procedure, categories, prizes and dinner inclusion\/exclusion<\/p>\n

9.\u00a0 Sponsorship of some categories, but not all<\/p>\n

10.\u00a0\u00a0 Role of Afrigator<\/p>\n

11.\u00a0\u00a0 The controversial choice of www.watkykjy.co.za<\/a> as Best Blog in South Africa.<\/p>\n

12.\u00a0 Not mentioned previously is the male dominance of the organising committee (3 males), executive judges (5 males) and judges (48 of the 64\u00a0were male).\u00a0 I would like to predict that there are more female than male bloggers, and therefore they may not have been able to appreciate the female touch.\u00a0 We suggest a more balanced gender distribution for 2011!\u00a0\u00a0 From what I could see at the Vista Bar, there were definitely more male than female winners.<\/p>\n

We are delighted to read that each of the Top 10 finalists in each category will receive a ‘digital badge’ to feature on their blogs.\u00a0\u00a0 We also acknowledge their salute to bloggers and the great work that they do, and the thanks expressed to all participants.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

What is really obvious from the reply is that traditional media such as PR featured more strongly than social media in marketing the SA Blog Awards, an absolute contradiction, given that blogging is the foundation of social media marketing.\u00a0 The Twitter presence was poor, and the SA Blog Awards should have had a blog!<\/p>\n

This is the official response from the SA Blog Awards to criticism received:<\/p>\n

“On behalf of the SA Blog Awards we would like to thank all of the participants who contributed this year. These include the public, the nominees, the South African Bloggers and the judges. A special thanks to News 24, our other sponsors and suppliers and partners, without who the awards would not have been possible.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

A tremendous effort was made this year to move the SA Blog Awards to a new level. We feel that this has been accomplished. Where there are a few criticisms in the blogging industry, we welcome these and will look to learn from those that are factually correct. In addition we will shortly be implementing our review process, which we hope all will participate in.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The SA Blog Awards has been run by volunteers and goodwill up to now and the time and effort has been quite taxing. The new CEO, JP Naude,\u00a0stepped in after a casual conversations with Chris Rawlinson and Dave Duarte, and recognising the potential of the SA Blog Awards began implementing new support structures, media policies and other processes on a very short notice, and as such was still saddled with some systems which had been in place in the previous years. JP is well aware of the current flaws and has already, in a very short time added enormous additional value. JP immediately recognised that the first priority was to re-establish the credibility and integrity of the SA Blog Awards.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Contrary to what has been written in the public space regarding the nomination, registration and voting phases. (sic)\u00a0We made every effort to notify bloggers to register; we did this via the Afrigator database, email, twitter and notifications on our site. In addition we notified former voters of the nomination phase. During the nomination phase, the public vote phase and the judging phase we continually asked for nominees to register their contact details with us. After all phases had closed we still continued asking nominees to register their contact details. To date we are still struggling to get final correct details, in some cases nominees entered incorrect email addresses. During this process we manually went to the blogs and looked for contact details or mailed them from their site requesting details. Where we had contact details we used them to the best of our ability.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

When we talk about moving the blog awards up to a new level, we mean an improved voting process, more awareness for the bloggers of South Africa, better criteria for the judges to understand, and ensuring an equal platform for all nominees. All of these were done, but will again be reviewed in order to find the best possible formula.\u00a0
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

We asked judges which were subject related to the category to judge. This means the category was judged by an expert in the subject matter of that category which hopefully will assist the bloggers with better recognition, should they choose to seek endorsements or financial support for their blog.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

This year the SA Blog Awards was supported by News24 who have applied their online support for the bloggers. In addition the SA Blog Awards radio partner, Good Hope FM, supplied radio coverage pre -and post the event. Further has been garnered from the SABC News, SAFM, Cape Talk, 702, eTV News, The Digital Edge and several other online publications. All this was for the first time arranged with the kind support of Atmosphere PR, which added a much more professional dimension than in previous years.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

As a sponsor and supplier to the SA Blog Awards, Ogilvy Cape Town added their support with additional fun and creativity using a digital photographic concept on the night. These social media pictures have been published and will surely bring enjoyment to all bloggers and other viewers.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Our emphasis this year was on the readers of the blogs, with the judges in place to act as the guardians of the categories. We believe the readers of the blogs are of great importance and as such gave them a greater say in the voting process. The public vote counted for 70% and the judges vote 30%. This led us to the 24 hr voting system. This system allowed for blogs with regular readers to show their appreciation, and as such the blogs which have a loyal regular following rose to the top. Falling in line with our policy to continue striving for a better formula this process will be reviewed.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

We increased the number of active voters in excess of 300% from 2009 to 2010.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Our judges were given several criteria to look at, these included, Design, Content Quality, Reader Engagement, Relevance to the category, and Overall Experience. These are factors that we believe make a good blog and bring the reader to the forefront. A factor we believe the judges must prioritise during scoring.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Finally we asked an executive judging panel to look at the winners of each category in order to determine an overall winner. The Executive Judging panel then scored the top three blogs they thought were most deserving.\u00a0 These scores were compiled and an end result calculated to indicate the final overall winner. The results were conclusive.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The night itself was an overwhelming success bar one or two glitches. The night was invite only, this meant we arranged an event which was limited in numbers, however free to the nominees and invited guests. The venue, The One & Only, we believe was befitting the stature of the event and was appropriate considering that we were recognising the best bloggers in South Africa. Furthermore the night was well arranged, sound was excellent, light, and multimedia quality was good. In addition, our MC Mumzy was also exceptional.\u00a0 We would have loved to have all top ten nominees at the awards, but during the 2010 stage this was just not logistically or financially feasible.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

In terms of prizes we have had queries on several fronts, many say prizes are not necessary and that the prize is the prestige of winning, some say there should be financial incentives. Again we will engage our audience and ask the question.\u00a0 Which do they prefer? Our overall winner received an iPad from News 24, a Black Berry from Vodacom and vouchers from, Rocket seed, Sunglass Hut and Obox. In addition we commissioned a fantastic glass sculpture as the overall award, again a step up from years before.
\n\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The category winners each received a glass award engraved with the details of that category as well as the aforementioned vouchers. Each top ten finalist will still receive a digital\u00a0 badge to showcase on their blog, with category winners, and the overall winner receiving relevant winners badges.
\n\u00a0
\nFinally we engaged local computer wholesaler Infinitix to supply us with PC equipment for a charity of our choosing. We chose the community centre in Bridgetown. This community is plagued by violence, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, teenage pregnancy and several other social evils. Marlon Parker from Rlabs is involved with this community centre, and they have made a significant improvement in changing the lives of many within this community using social media. We trust that the PC equipment we handover to Marlon will help him with his continued effort to use social media to better the lives of those suffering under the hardships they live in.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n


\nWe once again urge the bloggers of South Africa to stand by the SA Blog Awards and work towards improving the process together with us. The respect of the blogging community lies in the hands of the bloggers.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n


\nAt the SA Blog Awards we will continue to seek, recognise and reward the best bloggers in South Africa. Our work is however not finished. We will keep the pulse of the SA Blog Awards alive in South Africa constantly.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n


\nOnce again congratulations to the bloggers of South Africa whether good or bad, big or small, we are proud of the fact that you are blogging. You are the new voice of society”.\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Chris von Ulmenstein, Whale Cottage Portfolio: www.whalecottage.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Despite posting an invitation via Twitter to the SA Blog Awards organising committee of JP Naude, Dave Duarte and Chris Rawlinson to respond to our criticism of the SA Blog Awards 2010, we received nothing more than a not-so-understandable Direct Message on Twitter from Chris Rawlinson: “I think if you had taken a few mins […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false},"categories":[4795,3,124,21],"tags":[7661,7671,7607,7674,7663,7665,6838,3638,4134,7592,32378,4857,7660,7594,7667,7659,7672,7683,169,7634,7676,7593,7664,7668,7675,503,7658,2785,1377,7657,7669,7670,32395,32388,1882,7677,7673,7662,7678,1587,1152,7666,32373],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t