Tag Archives: ADT

Franschhoek Literary Festival Sweet and ADT Sour Service Awards

The Sweet Service Award  goes to Jenny Hobbs and Sheenagh Tyler, tireless organisers of the Franschhoek Literary Festival, for a fantastic 5th Festival, and for filling the beds and restaurants of Franschhoek over this stimulating weekend.  More than 7000 tickets were sold for 70 programme sessions, up by 50 % compared to 2010.  It is the first time in many months that the village has been buzzing, and that most establishments were fully booked.  It also created a wonderful interaction between Festival goers, who enjoyed chatting to complete strangers, sharing their passion for reading books and writing.

The Sour Service Award  goes to ADT, for suspending its service to Whale Cottage Franschhoek due to an account that was not paid according to their records, even though our records showed that we had, thereby leaving the guest house unarmed for 24 hours until we got to Franschhoek for the Literary Festival.  We subscribe to their service in Plettenberg Bay too, and this may have caused the confusion, especially as the company now runs its administrative operation from Cape Town, and does not state which regional service it is communicating about or sending invoices for.  The suspension was communicated by empty sms, to which we reacted by call.  SMS’s sent in reply are ignored and not reacted to.  The ADT Paarl manager Emile Weaver was able to expedite the re-connection as soon as they had received our cheque.  One would have expected a manager to have called proactively, to prevent the suspension in the first instance.  ADT has a near-monopoly in Franschhoek, there being no security company alternative. ADT appears to be run by the accounts department.

The WhaleTales Sweet & Sour Service Awards are presented every Friday on the WhaleTales blog.  Nominations for the Sweet and Sour Service Awards can be sent to Chris von Ulmenstein at info@whalecottage.com.   Past winners of the Sweet and Sour Service Awards can be read on the Friday posts of this blog, and in the WhaleTales newsletters on the www.whalecottage.com website.

Wine business is boom-ing in Franschhoek!

About a year ago I wrote an e-mail to Franschhoek Wine Valley, as the tourism association is now called, and fed back my experiences about the off-putting security practices of wine estates in Franschhoek as far as their booms are concerned.   Yesterday I went for a drive to some of Franschhoek’s leading wine estates with my colleague, and this is what we experienced :

*   Allee Bleue – having had a history of tight security and rude boom operators, new GM Wolfgang Leyrer turned the security staff at the boom into his ‘welcome committee’, dressing them into smart blue shirts, black pants and blue bow-tie, even if they work for outsourced Centurion security company.  The boom is usually open, or is opened immediately, and it wins the top boom award for professionalism and friendliness.

*   Solms Delta – the boom off the R45 was closed on our arrival, and we had to hoot for it to be opened, but mercifully there was no sign-in procedure.  Thereafter the gates are open at Solms Delta itself.  I am surprised at the variability in the security – on many days the boom is open anyway, on weekends in particular, and one wonders why their boom is not open during the opening hours of the wine estate.

*   L’Ormarins has a non-negotiable security person, and one may not pass go until something/anything is filled into the security sheet.  This is more important than anything else at this wine estate, one gets the feeling.   They are absolutely consistent in applying the rule!

*   Graham Beck uses Peaceforce Security.  I have experienced variability in its boom operations in the past, the previous time the security guard sitting in the window of his ‘hut’, but facing outgoing traffic, so that we had to hoot for him to open.  There was no signing in then.   Even when he saw us, we had to hoot, so that he could press the button to let us out.  Yesterday we had to hoot to get him to come to the car, and we had to sign in.   He was signing in someone else when we wanted to leave, and he arrogantly let us wait until he finished with the sign-in before he let us out!  Once again, the attitude of this boom operator does not reflect the amazing welcome we received inside the tasting room, and does not reflect the Graham Beck ethos.

*   La Motte has mostly had an open boom since Pierneef à La Motte opened in September, or one could tell the boom operator that one had a booking at the restaurant, and then one was allowed in immediately.  On Sunday I observed the first ever signing-in, with the resultant queue building up, not an ideal situation for guests running late, as I was, and it was just a further hold up.  I smiled sweetly at the security man from Xone, gave him my name, and asked him to fill in my details, and he obliged.  When I arrived yesterday, the security person Inge was chatting to a person in a security company vehicle quite far from the boom, and she did not acknowledge my presence at all.   I thought they were her colleagues, as they were chatting.  I hooted, and overtook this vehicle.  She ignored me completely.  When she came to my car, she gave me a mouthful, and referred to me breaking the rules on Sunday (I had not dealt with her nor seen her then), and gave me the rudest “welcome” of the day, and almost put me off driving inside.   Her interaction with me was completely the opposite to every friendly interaction I have ever experienced at La Motte.  She is an absolute liability to the La Motte brand, and does not share this wine estate’s promise of “a culture of excellence”!

*   Maison is always open and welcoming, although it was closed yesterday.  Its gate is closed when the tasting room is closed, and there is no sign-in procedure at all, and this is a reflection of the friendly welcome one receives at this wine estate.  One hopes that it stays this way.

*   Grande Provence has a security presence via ADT at its entrance, but has no boom at all, and the security staff is a token presence.

*  Boekenhoutskloof has no security at all.  When the tasting room is closed, the gate is closed.  On weekdays the gate is welcomingly open during its operating hours. 

*   Holden Manz is the newest wine estate to be boom-ing, and ADT operates the security.  I mainly visit here at night, to eat at the Franschhoek Kitchen, and they should see the car lights approaching from their ‘hut’.  I have not once had them proactively open the boom or even walk to it!   Last night I was allowed to drive in without signing in when I said that I was going to the restaurant.  On my way out the security person was at the boom already, and opened it to allow me to drive out without stopping.  I suspect that Chef Bjorn Dingemans had done the necessary to achieve this service efficiency.

One wonders why some Franschhoek wine farms feel the need for security, and others don’t.   Other than Allee Bleue and Solms Delta,  it appears that the boom-ing Franschhoek wine estates do not realise how irritating it is to have to sign in.  I scribbled my name in all instances, and no security person stopped me from entering.   Most have security cameras anyway, and will capture on film any attempted criminal activity.  In all cases, other than Solms Delta, security is outsourced, and not unsurprisingly, the outsourced security staff tend to be the rude, arrogant or inefficient ones, with the exception of Allee Bleue.

My advice to Franschhoek (and other) wine farms : let your customers enter as easily as possible.  Make your security staff your ambassadors, guiding the visitors directionally as to where they want to be, and use them as part of your PR program.  Train outsourced security staff in customer interaction, and the values you and your wine estate stand for.   Make the arrival as welcoming and efficient as possible – if you have to have a boom, get the security guys out of their ‘huts’ and let them stand at the boom, to open or close the boom before the cars stop at it and have to hoot.  Then business on your wine estate should boom! 

Chris von Ulmenstein, Whale Cottage Portfolio: www.whalecottage.com  Twitter: @WhaleCottage

Paarl Motors Sweet and ADT Paarl Sour Service Awards

The Sweet Service Award goes to Paarl Motors.   A customer locked the keys in the boot of the car.  The spare keys were in Cape Town.   Fortunately the customer had left the windows of the car partly open.  The internal boot release would not work as the alarm went off once the car door was opened.  The customer called Paarl Motors, and the Service Manager Dougie Taylor was of the opinion that the problem could be fixed via the car battery.  The customer was not able to do the technical procedures, and therefore two mechanics were sent from Paarl to Franschhoek, to assist the customer.  With telephonic guidance from a colleague, the two mechanics managed to get the internal boot release to work, and the customer could get the keys out of the boot.  When the customer called Dougie to thank him and his team, and to make arrangements for the payment of the service, Dougie declined the offer for payment, saying it was part of the service they offer at Paarl Motors!     

The Sour Service Award goes to ADT in Paarl.  The customer had picked up that an accidental alarm activation had not lead to a call from ADT in Paarl.  ADT was called, and they stated that they had not picked up an alarm signal.   It being a Sunday, the technical assistant said that he would leave a message for his colleagues, to visit the premises the following day, to check the alarm.   By lunchtime the following day, no call had been received from ADT, and therefore the customer called again.   The technical advisor had no record of a message about the alarm, but promised to send his colleagues immediately.   However, he was most pedantic about the payment, insisting that the service call be paid for immediately and demanding to know the method of payment, without knowing what the problem was with the alarm.  The technicians took about one and a half hours to arrive in Franschhoek, and sat down to write the invoice before they even looked at the alarm.  Once again, they were adamant to know how they would be paid before they looked at the alarm.   It appeared that the radio receiver had to be replaced.  Before paying, the customer wanted to test the alarm, but everytime the alarm was activated, no call was received from ADT’s control centre.   However, the technicians called and sms’d the control centre, asking them to call the customer, which was hardly proof of the alarm working.   The customer was under time pressure, and had to leave, and the ADT technicians left as well, without payment being made.   No ADT executive followed up to check on the customer’s satisfaction, nor to clear the payment issue.  An invoice was sent by ADT to the customer by post, and was paid, as a subsequent test of the alarm showed that it was working again. 

ADT RESPONSE:   “Adrian Good, Regional Managing Director of ADT Security Western Cape, said, “Thank you for highlighting this although the technician was testing the system correctly, he seems not to have communicated the process he was following adequately to the customer. I will address this with him and our other technical staff.   For more information on the testing procedure: When testing an alarm system, the technician places the system on SMS testing. This means that when he triggers the alarm to test it and the signal is received by the Control Monitoring Centre an automated acknowledgement is sent by the system directly to the cell phone as an SMS. This is to ensure that alarm testing does not interfere with ADT resources that are handling potential emergencies.”

 

In both instances the customer had a technical problem to solve.  Paarl Motors did not talk money, nor conditions of payment before or after completion of their call, compared to ADT, for whom payment was the be all and end all, and the customer satisfaction apparently of lesser concern.   The customer holds Paarl Motors in even higher esteem than before.   Perhaps ADT could entertain invoicing service calls, as was done ultimately, as a lot of unpleasant interaction can be avoided, valuable technician time can be saved, and a better customer relationship can be maintained. 

The WhaleTales Sweet & Sour Service Awards are presented every Friday on the WhaleTales blog.  Nominations for the Sweet and Sour Service Awards can be sent to Chris von Ulmenstein at info@whalecottage.com.   Past winners of the Sweet and Sour Service Awards can be read on the Friday posts of this blog, and in the WhaleTales newsletters on the www.whalecottage.com website.