Tag Archives: self-catering

City puts Guest Accommodation Policy to bed!

After studying industry input to its Draft Guest Accommodation Policy for almost a year, the City of Cape Town adopted the final Guest Accommodation Policy on 7 April.   The announcement came via the Cape Times, and the industry bodies have not reacted to its contentious content.  Not much of the industry feedback and input appears to have been accepted by the City.

 

The need for a unified guest accommodation policy came about because the City of Cape Town consisted of six municipalities previously, each with their own rezoning requirements for accommodation establishments.   The unified City wants to implement one unified accommodation policy, to apply to all new applications for temporary departures and rezoning.

 

The City decided to ignore an industry request that a Bed & Breakfast, defined as an establishment in which the owners live and is predominantly a residential building housing the family, be allowed to have more than three letable bedrooms.   The new Policy stipulates “no more than 3 rooms and no more than 6 paying lodgers/guests per land unit”.   No self-catering facilities are allowed in a B&B at all, a very contentious rule.   B&B’s do not have to apply for temporary departures or rezoning.

 

Guest houses are defined as having a “maximum size of 30 persons or 15 rooms permitted”.   This is an above average large size for a guest house, but this request came from the industry.   What is completely contradictory is that both guest houses and B & B’s are not allowed to employ more than 3 staff members “at any given time”!   It would be impossible for 3 staff members, of whom one would be a manager, to be able to service 15 rooms every day.  It also means that no shifts could be set up, as it would increase the staff requirement.  The hospitality industry is supporting the initiative to curb unemployment, and to have a staff restriction placed upon it is not understandable.  

 

For backpackers, self-catering apartments and hotels no restrictions are set for the number of staff.   All establishment types, even hotels, have to provide on-site parking, one bay or more for every guest room, which many do not offer.

 

All establishments, irrespective of their definition, may not sell alcohol without a licence, and may only sell it at the times of the day specified in the City’s new Draft Liquor by-law, which is yet to be redrafted after the criticism it received from the hospitality industry.

 

More details of the new Guest Accommodation Policy can be found on http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/planningandbuilding/Publications/Documents/Guest_Accommodation_Policy.pdf

 

FEDHASA is a farce!

FEDHASA is an association purporting to represent the interests of the hospitality industry.  However, the association pays lip service to its Small Accommodation segment, consisting of B&B’s, Guest Houses and Self-Catering establishments, and in essence therefore is nothing more than a hotel association. 

Currently four of the six FEDHASA Cape Board members (Phillip Couvaras from the Table Bay Hotel, Nigel Pace from the Cape Grace Hotel, Nils Heckscher from the Winchester Mansions, and Susanne Faussner from the Greenways Hotel) are from the Hotel segment, despite roughly equal numbers of hotels, small accommodation establishments, restaurants and allied suppliers making up the roughly 550 membership of FEDHASA Cape. Currently there is no Small Accommodation owner to look after the interests of this segment on the Board.  

In June, Faussner allowed herself to be nominated in the Small Accommodation segment, despite her hotel not meeting the description of B&B, Guest House or Self-Catering establishment.   This nomination was condoned by then-Chairman Nils Heckscher, who motivated his decision on the basis of the Greenways Hotel being “small”, clearly not  being aware that the FEDHASA Cape website clearly defines which type of establishments are represented in the Small Accommodation segment.  Hotels are a separate segment within FEDHASA Cape. 

Couvaras was elected as the new Chairman of FEDHASA Cape at the AGM in June, against a Guest House owner and a Restaurant representative.  He had only been in the country for four months when he was elected, an unknown entity in the local hospitality industry.   He naively admitted that he had been encouraged by the FEDHASA Board to stand as Chairman, to prevent the control of FEDHASA Cape from falling into non-Hotel hands!   After his election, he admitted that he did not know anything about Cape Town Routes Unlimited and Cape Town Tourism, and what they stood for. 

The recent press release sent out by FEDHASA Cape about MATCH is testimony to the big hotel perspective that FEDHASA propogates, especially as it has a MATCH representative on the National FEDHASA Board.  FEDHASA has encouraged all its members, including small accommodation establishments, to sign up with MATCH, despite hearing that MATCH is not favourable for Small Accommodation establishments.  Faussner was dead against the MATCH terms a year ago, when she was the Alternate Director of FEDHASA Cape! 

Couvaras angered his Alternate Directors by keeping them from the 1 August Board meeting by means of a dishonest e-mail, announcing the postponement of the Board meeting to a later date.  However the Board meeting did in fact take place.  An e-mail written to Couvaras 9 weeks ago, with subsequent reminders, to question the reason for the dishonesty, and the reasons for excluding the attendance of Alternate Directors at the Board meeting, remains unanswered, as do telephonic messages left with his efficient-sounding secretary.   Support for a reply from Couvaras was sought from National FEDHASA Board Chairman Eddy Khosa, who promised to return calls, but never did, and from Brett Dungan, CEO of FEDHASA’s national office, who refused to discuss the matter and rudely put down the phone.    Khosa remains Chairman of FEDHASA’s national board, despite having been suspended as CEO from the Johannesburg Tourism Company earlier this year. 

None of the Board members of FEDHASA Cape were elected constitutionally at the AGM, but this was written off to a “technical omission” and has been ignored.  Past Chairman Nils Heckscher and Couvaras have a very elastic interpretation of the Constitution, to suit their needs.

FEDHASA Cape recently tried to exaggerate the restaurant robbery situation is Sea Point, probably because one of its Director’s restaurants was affected, for the sake of obtaining publicity for the association.  The Sea Point police expressed its dissatisfaction about the misleading information in FEDHASA’s media statement.

For many years FEDHASA has set itself up as the lobbying body for the hospitality industry, and its media releases claim that it is “.. the lobbying body and watchdog for the South African hospitality industry nationally, and in all tiers of government on tourism, legislation, trading conditions, taxation, education and related industry issues.”   This is a hugely overstated claim, as no such discussions take place in FEDHASA Cape board meetings.  The Association did not manage to achieve any success in getting its input to the Sectoral Determination for the Hospitality Industry to be adopted by the Department of Labour.   Surprisingly, the Department of Labour is not represented on the national Board of FEDHASA, being one of the most important stakeholders for the industry.

Since its inception four years ago, Cape Town Routes Unlimited (CTRU) had one Board position for a FEDHASA Cape representative, taken up by Previous-FEDHASA Cape Chairmen Neil Markovitz and Nils Heckscher.   Heckscher resigned from the CTRU Board earlier this year, but would not tell his FEDHASA Cape Board why he had done so, other than citing “personal reasons”.   His letter of resignation from the CTRU Board was subsequently leaked to the Cape Argus, and cited the Board politics as one of his reasons for the resignation.  It is surprising that Heckscher did not persevere, in using his often-quoted strategy of “quiet diplomacy” to sort things out.  His resignation is detrimental to the hospitality industry, as it no longer has representation on the CTRU Board, now chaired by ex-Sun International CEO Peter Bacon.  FEDHASA Cape and CTRU have had an incestuous relationship, in that CTRU Executive Director Bekithemba Langilabele has been co-opted on to the FEDHASA Cape Board for the past few years. Despite the industry’s criticism of the ineffectiveness of CTRU in marketing Cape Town and the Western Cape, discussions about CTRU and how it could be given input by FEDHASA to meet the industry’s needs better were not encouraged by Heckscher.

Last year Heckscher and Langalibalele set about a rewrite of the Constitution, and their most important change was the introduction of a clause giving the Board the power to eject a fellow Director from the Board, despite directors being nominated and elected by the FEDHASA membership. 

Many FEDHASA members have questioned their membership benefits, and complain about being bombarded with e-mails from the association.   The administration and the marketing of the Association leave much to be desired, but this is condoned by the Board.   The fiduciary duty of the Board directors, prescribed by the Companies’ Act, cannot be exercised as the financials are never discussed in Board meetings.  The organisation’s finances are not very stable, with more members resigning than joining. The 2007/2008 financials were presented to the Board one week prior to the AGM.  Questions were refused, and directors were told to ask them at the AGM!

Couvaras, his Board and Executive Officer should be asked to resign, given their dishonest and discourteous behaviour towards the Alternate Directors.

The unprofessional and dishonest behaviour by Couvaras, and condonation thereof by his fellow directors, has led to the resignation of this writer as Alternate Director from the Board of FEDHASA, and the termination of the membership of all four Whale Cottages as FEDHASA Cape members. 

MATCH does not score with Small Accommodation

The FIFA accommodation and ticketing agency MATCH is struggling to find support amongst Guest Houses and B&B’s to make their accommodation available for the 2010 World Cup. Whilst 5 742 hotel rooms have already been booked via MATCH in Cape Town, only 735 “non-hotel rooms”, which could include B & B’s, self-catering establishments, and even university residences, boarding schools and college accommodation, have been booked, according to the Argus. In total 24 725 rooms have been booked with MATCH around the country, more than half short of the 55 000 room MATCH target.

Small accommodation establishments feel uncomfortable about making 80 % of their rooms available to MATCH, and to accept MATCH’s unfavourable cancellation policy. In 2006, MATCH cancelled large numbers of rooms in German hotels at short notice, without penalty. Also, the MATCH room pricing rate of 16 % on top of the 2007 rate to set the 2010 rate is not acceptable to many establishments, given that the inflation rate currently is around 12 %, which would leave establishments out of pocket. MATCH adds on a 40 % surplus to the small accommodation rates for its commission, which will make these establishments look far more expensive than they are in reality.